> > > Re:Photos - Latest First, or not?


Technical Message Board

Re:Photos - Latest First, or not? Click to ReplyReply 
  Author: Linda May Rumble  Homepage   Date: Nov 1, 8:54 PM
  In Reply To: Re:Photos - Latest First, or not?  by: Les

Dear Les & Ian & Alan,

I still do not agree with you, the undated photos should be first, for the reasons (eg. regarding Charts and other undated research infomation) I have given before that neither of you have addressed.

Tribal Pages is not Flicker... the Photos are not just family holiday photos - they include charts and other research material and on my website newly acquired DNA information that I do not want to date, because 8-20 or more names can be attached to each chart with relevant dates going back to the 1700s. I want these charts to appear at the top of people's profiles - and do not want to have to change the date every year to keep them at the top... DNA info will not change - it is static.

New cousins coming to our Family Tree website do not want to go through all their ancestors photos and scroll to the bottom of the pile... just in case there is DNA Chart information there. It would be so much easier to immediately get a clear picture of the proof of our ancestral links if this important information remains at the top.

We will have to agree to differ... our opinions are based on personal choice. What a shame that we cannot choose how we want our photos ordered now this unwanted alteration has happened to our websites... but I expect that option will be too difficult to do.


Related Link:https://www.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=p0tter&view=63&pid=10&bview=0&rand=329920004


Image Source https://www.tribalpages.com/tribe/browse?userid=p0tter&view=0&pid=85&randi=98148325



 
Home |  Join Now |  Features |  Family Tree Sites |  Charts |  Search |  Help |  Feedback |  Privacy